The tension felt in the modern world between those who look at the confluence of neuroscientific data, historical data, and other information illuminating our past and those who simply accept received wisdom as their guide in life is real and profound. Yet it may not be as divisive as one would think. It appears that all of us share the same moral networks and systems, and we all respond in similar ways to similar issues. The only thing different, then, is not our behavior but our theories about why we respond the way we do. It seems to me that understanding that our theories are the source of all our conflicts would go a long way in helping people with different belief systems to get along.
About
Teachings from the Buddha-dhamma, nondual, and other contemplative traditions. A place to share things I'm reading and listening to, and to engage in dialogue.
I've been a Theravadan practitioner for around 10 years. Before that, I focused on Ch'an/Zen as a religion major in university. Currently I am a student at NYZCCC in the foundations of Buddhist contemplative care program.
I welcome your questions, and invite you to listen and reflect further with me.
loading tweets…
Following
Also of note
-
“Apart from the futility of effort itself, any attempt to prevent thoughts from arising divides the mind artificially into that which does the...”
-
Tibetan woodcut of the chakras
-
“I am sorry” i.e. 1st recognize that mind creates all misery
“please forgive me” i.e. 2nd, mind surrenders to the principle of awareness
“I love...
-
“Attention is the most basic form of love; through it we bless and are blessed”— John Tarrant
